![]() Each panel addressed a specific topic related to the Privacy Rule’s de-identification methodologies and policies. OCR convened stakeholders at a workshop consisting of multiple panel sessions held March 8-9, 2010, in Washington, DC. In developing this guidance, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) solicited input from stakeholders with practical, technical and policy experience in de-identification. ![]() This guidance is intended to assist covered entities to understand what is de-identification, the general process by which de-identified information is created, and the options available for performing de-identification. The guidance explains and answers questions regarding the two methods that can be used to satisfy the Privacy Rule’s de-identification standard: Expert Determination and Safe Harbor 1. It's a wait and see (or not) until then.This page provides guidance about methods and approaches to achieve de-identification in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Rule. So what might we expect from the redacted affidavit, if Judge Reinhardt releases it? It's hard to know until we see it. But when Zaid gave the government a copy of the man's obituary in an effort to get the full document released, "they said, it's not him." Cooper skyjacking case, for example, "we thought a document pertained to a particular person who was dead," he said. ![]() In FOIA litigation connected with the D.B. The client may be able to identify a witness, or piece together what was said in a discussion in which he or she participated, for example.īut generally, "it's not a smart thing to speculate," Zaid explained, because even educated guesses can be wrong. Zaid said that even when information in court papers is redacted, it's sometimes possible to figure out what's in the blacked-out sections. Whoever sent them had provided the original pages, rather than making a photocopy, he explained. Zaid said he once received some redacted documents in a case and discovered that he could hold them up and read the words through the black ink. "It's a really sloppy-looking redaction, but no one will ever see what I cut out." In other instances, if he's instructed by the government to redact information from a document, he deletes the text and types the number of words and "deleted by the request of CIA" in its place.īut manual redactions on actual paper can go awry, too. His preferred method is to "literally cut it out with scissors and then photocopy the page," he said. Zaid generally eschews electronic redaction. 18, 2022, that portions of the affidavit could be released, with stipulations. Justice Department objected to the release of the affidavit, saying it would compromise their investigation. Affidavits often contain information about what evidence law enforcement thinks is at a property, and other facts, including witnesses who may have provided testimony. And attorneys for several media outlets, including The Associated Press, The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, argued in court for the release of the affidavit supporting the warrant. Given the unprecedented nature of searching a former president's home, there was been an unusual amount of transparency surrounding the warrant. § 1519: Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations and bankruptcy, which carries a penalty of up to 20 years in prison ( obstruction of justice). § 2071: Concealment, removal or mutilation generally, which carries a penalty of up to three years in prison and disqualification from holding office ( concealing of public records). § 793: Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information, which carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison ( violation of the espionage act).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |